OraTaiao calls for nominations for its Executive Board

30 Oct 2019 3:41 PM | Anonymous

OraTaiao, the NZ Climate and Health Council, is calling for nominations for the Executive Board, including the co-convenor positions. They are particularly seeking nominations from Māori and Pasifika members in order to strengthen the organisation’s focus on Te Tiriti and health equity. More information about OraTaiao is available here.

The positions open for election are:

  • Co-convenors (two, at least one of whom is Māori) 
  • Officers of the Executive Board (up to fourteen) 

The nomination form is available here. Nominations close 5pm, Monday 11 November 2018 and must include a nominator, seconder and acceptance by the nominee. Further instructions are on the form.

Please consider putting yourself forward to support this important kaupapa. If you have any questions or need assistance with nomination, please feel free to contact Rhys Jones (rg.jones@auckland.ac.nz), Alex Macmillan (alex.macmillan@otago.ac.nz) or Richard Jaine (richjaine@hotmail.com).

Ngā mihi nui.

Public Health Association Logo

PHA Conference

Get curious

Get engaged

Get involved

Upcoming events

The PHA – a strong and informed collective voice for a healthy and well New Zealand.

Privacy | Contact

Copyright © Public Health Association of New Zealand 2016

Log in

Letter to the Listener 28 July 2017 in response to Fever Pitch (Listener 21 July 2017)

Catherine Woulfe’s thorough investigation of rheumatic fever brings to the surface a range of important questions not only about this cruel disease, but also wider issues about health policy. The Government’s bold initiative to reduce the incidence of rheumatic fever as one of its 'Better Public Service' targets in 2012 certainly raised awareness of rheumatic fever for the general public as well as communities and families directly affected. But even when medical science and the public have a clearer understanding of the immediate causes of rheumatic fever, interventions like the $65m ‘sore throats matter’ still won’t stop the epidemic. 

Ramona Tiatia’s blunt description of the experience of affected families not only painted a picture of the impact on affected families and communities, it also highlighted the invidious choices our health funders face.  How much should we prioritise health spending between response to the urgent need of young people whose lives and potential can be devastated by the disease versus the expense of addressing the economic and social factors that underlie the reasons we have this epidemic at all?   

As several of the clinicians interviewed pointed out, it’s only when the poverty and over-crowded housing issues are addressed that we will make a real difference.

Rheumatic fever illustrates the contradictions in our health system identified in the recent American Commonwealth Fund report. Of the 11 countries the Fund monitors, the work our health professionals do is ranked among the highest. But our overall performance as a health system falls to the middle ranking because of our poor performance on access and equity. The Fund also notes that our per capita expenditure is among the cheapest. 

Failure to invest in real prevention - that is, poverty, housing, good nutrition etc. - will continue to drive conditions like rheumatic fever, whether the immediate cause is strep throat or skin sores, until we invest upstream.

Why not spend more on these conditions - the economic and social determinants of health? 

We all pay in the long run - the young people whose misery we tolerate and whose potential remains unfulfilled, the families whose sacrifices are unrewarded, and the taxpayer who picks up the tab.

Ngā mihi,
Warren Lindberg

CE Public Health Association of New Zealand


Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software