Executive Director of Allied Health Scientific and Technical

01 May 2018 1:49 PM | Anonymous

Health services in Canterbury continue to transform and we have another exciting opportunity to reshape the way we operate, leading and developing Allied Health Scientific and Technical services that will sustain us well into the future.

We have a rare opportunity due to internal movement for you to join the Executive Team of The Canterbury District Health Board and West Coast District Health Board as the Executive Director of Allied Health Scientific and Technical. You will lead and seek to redesign the delivery of integrated health care in our duel DHB model.


Reporting to the CEO of the CDHB and WCDHB, you will work in partnership with the Board of Directors, Executive Team, Senior Leadership Teams of our major services, our Allied Health, Scientific and Technical Workforce and other District Health Boards to transform systems and develop a skilled and resourced workforce at the forefront of inter-disciplinary care. Heading a dynamic team of Clinicians, you will shine a light on Allied Health, Scientific and Technical professions ensuring their centrality in the planning, implementation and delivery of services. You will be based at our Corporate Office in the Central City but working with our services across Canterbury and the West Coast


How to Apply

Apply online, or to find out more information, please contact Hayley Buick, Recruitment Specialist – Allied Health, Phone: (03) 3377961 or email hayley.buick@cdhb.health.nz

Applications are only accepted online so please visit CDHB website to complete an application.

Public Health Association Logo

PHA Conference


Get curious

Get engaged

Get involved


Upcoming events

The PHA – a strong and informed collective voice for a healthy and well New Zealand.

Privacy | Contact

Copyright © Public Health Association of New Zealand 2016

Log in

Letter to the Listener 28 July 2017 in response to Fever Pitch (Listener 21 July 2017)

Catherine Woulfe’s thorough investigation of rheumatic fever brings to the surface a range of important questions not only about this cruel disease, but also wider issues about health policy. The Government’s bold initiative to reduce the incidence of rheumatic fever as one of its 'Better Public Service' targets in 2012 certainly raised awareness of rheumatic fever for the general public as well as communities and families directly affected. But even when medical science and the public have a clearer understanding of the immediate causes of rheumatic fever, interventions like the $65m ‘sore throats matter’ still won’t stop the epidemic. 

Ramona Tiatia’s blunt description of the experience of affected families not only painted a picture of the impact on affected families and communities, it also highlighted the invidious choices our health funders face.  How much should we prioritise health spending between response to the urgent need of young people whose lives and potential can be devastated by the disease versus the expense of addressing the economic and social factors that underlie the reasons we have this epidemic at all?   

As several of the clinicians interviewed pointed out, it’s only when the poverty and over-crowded housing issues are addressed that we will make a real difference.

Rheumatic fever illustrates the contradictions in our health system identified in the recent American Commonwealth Fund report. Of the 11 countries the Fund monitors, the work our health professionals do is ranked among the highest. But our overall performance as a health system falls to the middle ranking because of our poor performance on access and equity. The Fund also notes that our per capita expenditure is among the cheapest. 

Failure to invest in real prevention - that is, poverty, housing, good nutrition etc. - will continue to drive conditions like rheumatic fever, whether the immediate cause is strep throat or skin sores, until we invest upstream.

Why not spend more on these conditions - the economic and social determinants of health? 

We all pay in the long run - the young people whose misery we tolerate and whose potential remains unfulfilled, the families whose sacrifices are unrewarded, and the taxpayer who picks up the tab.

Ngā mihi,
Warren Lindberg

CE Public Health Association of New Zealand

                                            

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software